Abstract
In the last years advances on the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have been limited, with no relevant changes. On the other side, there have been important improvements in genetic characterization leading to the concept of risk adapted treatment. This study aims to describe prognostic variables that influence survival and compare consolidation modalities of intermediate risk (IR) patients. We retrospectively evaluated 222 patients aged ≤75 years with AML from four Argentinian institutions between 2005 and 2015. Median overall survival was 11months (IQR 5.03-27.87). By cytogenetic, the IR group was more prevalent (51.4%) followed by adverse risk (AR) (23.4%) and low risk (LR) (11.7%). From a total of 198 patients (89.2%) who received 7/3 induction, 154 (77.7%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 21 (10.6%) died within 30 days from induction. By univariate analysis age, secondary AML, cytogenetic risk and lack of CR achievement were variables associated with worse prognosis; after running the multivariate model, lack of achievement CR after first line treatment was the variable that remained significant after 2 inductions (HR 7 95%CI 4.8-10) p=0.001. Consolidation modalities by frequency were: intensive chemotherapy 102 patients (69%), allogeneic transplantation 50 patients (29%) and supportive care 2 patients (2%). The analysis among IR group showed no survival difference between consolidation treatments (intensive chemotherapy vs. allogeneic transplant). This pilot study conducted without financial support, outside controlled clinical trials, provides real-world information on clinical and treatment aspects of AML and the authors consider it as a basis for generating further studies of greater complexity in the future.
References
2. Aber D, Orazi A, Hasserjian R y col. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016; 127: 2391-2405.
3. Döhner H, Weisdorf DJ, Bloomfield CD. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 1136-52.
4. Liersch R, Müller-Tidow C, Berdel WE y col. Prognostic factors for acute myeloid leukaemia in adults-biological significance and clinical use. Br J Haematol. 2014 Apr; 165(1): 17-38.
5. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV y col. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010; 116: 354-65.
6. Cheson BD, Cassileth PA, Head DR y col. Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1990; 8: 813-819.
7. Kantarjian H. Acute myeloid leukemia-major progress over four decades and glimpses into the future. Am J Hematol. 2016; 91(1): 131-45.
8. Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S y col. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010; 115: 453-74.
9. Medeiros B, Othus M, Estey E y col. Unsuccessful Diagnostic Analysis Is a Poor Prognostic Feature in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2014; 164(2): 245-250.
10. Estey E. Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2014 update on risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2014; 89(11)1063-1081.
11. Pavlovsky S, Gonzalez-Llaven J, García Martinez MA. A randomized study of mitoxantrone plus cytarabine versus daunomycin plus cytarabine in the treatment of previously untreated adult patients with acute no nlymphocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol. 1994; 69(1):11-5.
All material published in the journal HEMATOLOGÍA (electronic and print version) is transferred to the Argentinean Society of Hematology. In accordance with the copyright Act (Act 11 723), a copyright transfer form will be sent to the authors of approved works, which has to be signed by all the authors before its publication. Authors should keep a copy of the original since the journal is not responsible for damages or losses of the material that was submitted. Authors should send an electronic version to the email: revista@sah.org.ar
